Autotrophy - Elimination of the Emotional Hunger in the World / Part B

 

Galia Koplis©  

 

 

The contribution of financiers/ capitalists

 

The obsessive drive and aggressiveness of the financiers has contributed, to some extent, to the development of mankind. There is no need to abolish the upper class that contributed to the concentration and flow of resources and to workers and work in an orderly manner. And as noted above, the upper class has also contributed to the raising of the bar of luxury and comfort which has also permeated to the less affluent classes

 

 The system of a just and uniform division of resources razes the society and is contrary to human nature. The problem is not wealth but rather wealth obtained by weakening others and distorting the society

 

For what do the money people receive their capital

 

They contribute to society in two ways - distribution and organization

 

Distribution, that is, the distribution of goods including marketing overseas, which has not only brought new products but has also brought about a cultural exchange and enriched the culture, just as the pollen of flowers and trees is dispersed by insects and animals. This is the contribution of trade, which is a process that helps cultural treasures flow to other places so that they can exploit them for their own benefit

 

 Culture cannot advance on its own, it needs the friction and fertilization of other cultures. Trading is also not an easy process. The pressure and insecurity in receiving compensation for the goods is responsible for part of the obsession of the wealthy to control the sources of capital

 

Organization is a different type of contribution. It prevents humanity from going into total chaos, it puts things in the right order, and it allows reasonable functioning of the society, appropriate for the same period. When the organizers have a vision, they know how to activate the workers to fulfill their duties. When they are often uninspired and selfish, they tend to limit the visionaries and stifle their creativity

 

The benefits of the wind that disperses the seeds

 

 The question is, who is more important? The tree that produces the fruit or the wind that disperses its seeds? Both are equally important.
And yet, those who cannot be uprooted are those who receive little, although it is impossible to survive without them

 

 A fair distribution of money and means does not always succeed because the person who owns the money is the one who decides how much he deserves and how much others deserve. And he usually decides that he should get the lion’s share, and customarily backs up this division with physical force or with the help of his capital

 

 Often money is given to him by a lot of poor people, or it is saved by taking advantage of the poor masses, including endangering their lives or forcibly appropriating their land and income sources. The amount of money they receive does not correlate with their hard work or contribution to humanity, or innovation, or sophistication. Some get rich from taking and others get rich from giving. And there are those who give little, and can live without it, but they take a lot

 

 In the pre-modern era, the leaders and the wealthy built palaces and paved roads and promoted the culture. Thus, too, the army in the past and in the present has developed things that are currently used by the public. This process was carried out by exploiting the people

 

 An example from the modern period is that of the so-called "Robber barons." These were businessmen who developed the railroad industry in the US, thereby expanding the freedom of travel of the lower classes and increasing the ability to distribute goods, but at the same time creating monopolies and scorning the quality of the products that they themselves created.

 

 

This is what all the tycoons who created and are creating large industries do. On the one hand, they reduced costs, made daily necessities cheaper and available, mass production shortened the amount of time people had to work for everyday products, especially food.

 

 On the other hand, they discovered that it was easier to take a penny from every poor person than to receive a large sum at once and thus found new ways to exploit this. Not only did they benefit from the masses, they also received and are still receiving government support and resources because of their contribution to the workers and also because of their power to put pressure on the government.

 

 

The way to drain money from the masses is to create consumer addiction, frequent changes in fashion, reduce product efficiency, buy small businesses, and take advantage of technologies which enable non-employment.

 

The institutionalization of agriculture, along with its usefulness, led to the beginning of capitalism when it limited the areas where people could live, go freely, and gather fruit as they pleased. A society with ownership of assets like the agricultural society is the one that started competitiveness, classes, poverty versus wealth, assets versus society, patriarchy. Today, the situation is even worse, the population explosion makes it difficult to buy an apartment or a house, and on the other hand, a small portion of the population owns too much real estate.

 

Today there is enough money, services, products and food to feed everyone in the world, but there will always be those who will deny access to them, only so they themselves will become infinitely rich.



 

The time of the tree

 

Does the majority have to subjugate itself to an obsessive minority that only wants to increase its own profits? Those people in the minority do not realize that they owe their wealth to those who earn minimum wage and even to the homeless, who contribute to the fear of the public who are afraid to join their ranks. They also owe their luxury and technology to the wisdom gathered throughout all the years of civilization.

 

Many businesses did not only contribute the least of the distribution and organization but they profited despite the damage caused to their factory and sometimes even because of the damage they caused others. And, much of the unjust enrichment is useless to humanity, like those who profit from simply transferring money from place to place through the Internet.

The dispersers of the seeds that will disperse, organize and keep silent 



as if the contribution of craftsmen, inventors, and cultural figures, philosophers, original clergymen, writers, painters, mothers of children is worth so little that they can be left to live with uncertainty about their survival. Not to mention that people have sacrificed their quality of life, liberty and even lives on the altar of all development.

 

Today, the inability to meet all of our needs is greater than in the past. Even in more developed countries there are threats of hunger and deprivation and during a period of insecurity; everything can collapse, even in the established classes.